On Monday 20 June 2005 04:31 am, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michael Krufky wrote: > >>> [02:09]<mkrufky> pmp: i'm back ... do u have any > >>> advice for me with the atsc scan? Is it a better > >>> sign that i got 'tuning failed' and not 'pid timeout' > >>> ? I'm looking for any sign that this driver is > >>> working correctly on my board. > >>> > >>> No pid timeout would be a better sign. tuning failed > >>> means that no lock has been reached. Try atscsan -A1 > >>> -v. You'll get "lock status: 0x1f" for a lock or 0x00 > >>> for no lock or something in between. > >> > >> Patrick- > >> > >> You intended for me to use -A3, not -A1, right? I am > >> using digital QAM256 cable. > > Sorry, yes actually -A2 is for cable (-A1 is for > terrestrial and -A3 for trying both), but it is untested > (ie. No one ever reported to run atscscan on ATSC-cable > successfully). > > Mac, can you confirm that atscscan is able to find > channels on ATSC-cable? Sorry. I do not have digital cable to test. It breaks my budget. > Patrick. > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
