Hi roh, I comitted your de-Nuernberg update to CVS. Thanks! On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:08:57AM +0200, Joachim Steiger wrote: > one strange thing i cannot find the reason of is: if i scan using this > data with kaffeine everything is fine. > if i scan with 'scan' it finds every transponder, but keeps looping a > _very_ long time and tries to scan 212.5MHz and 690MHz which are > carriers in Muenchen, but i checked and they are shurely not recievable > here. the information seems to come from the NIT, and is used, even if > i omit the option -n -n is for NIT-other, the NIT for the actual mux is always evaluated. If scan gets confused by their NITs it's a bug in scan. > also i get a lot of dups and some channels are duped but differ in the > fec-lo setting (most use 1/2 and some the same as fec-hi) > should the fec-lo be left on NONE (seems its done that way on nearly > ever initial tuning data) AFAIK hierarchical modulation is not used for DVB-T in Germany (but maybe for DVB-H?). So FEC-lo is usually NONE (or, it doesn't matter with hierarchy == NONE). Greetings, Johannes
