Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > ... > >>+#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,11)) >>+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(cinergyt2->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe(cinergyt2->udev, 1), >>+ send_buf, send_buf_len, &actual_len, 1000); >>+#else >> ret = usb_bulk_msg(cinergyt2->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe(cinergyt2->udev, 1), >> send_buf, send_buf_len, &actual_len, HZ); >>+#endif > > > I'm currently generating a new DVB patchset against 2.6.12-rc4. > Although I recognize that these version dependencies would make > life easier for people who want to use CVS with older kernels, > they would make my job more diffcult, as I cannot submit code > with them upstream. So I don't want to commit your patch. > > My plan is that starting with 2.6.12 I will put patchsets > in the download area that work with the latest stable > kernel, while CVS will work with the latest -rc. For now > you'll just have to keep your patch around seperately. > Does that mean all the other version dependencies are going to be removed? It almost seems like more work to keep a patch set for latest stable synced with CVS. But, its your call.. Best Regards, C.Y.M.
