On Sunday 27 March 2005 01:56, Mikko Rauhala wrote: > Oh yes, that. The firmware path is correct; I don't know about the rest, > though, _but_ considering that the Ubuntu hotplug package is the exact > same thing for both architectures (and I mean _exact_; the package > itself is platform-independent, and I haven't modified the scripts), I'm > currently rather thinking there may be a portability bug on the kernel > side. Like with the firmware loader? I would doubt it, since a lot of ppl has been testing the x86-64 side of stuff (at least the x-64 side). Besides, what can go wrong with writing to a pipe? Stuff go in one side, and comes out the other, right? > (I can't reboot right now to try and get the firmware agent to spew some > debug info, but will do that tomorrow in spite of the above hunch, as, > after all, I'm not an expert.) Call on when you know how firmware.agent is behaving, at least then we'll know some actual facts, not just guessing about where the problem is.. ..you know! Kenneth
