Thomas Knauer wrote: > Hi Manu, > > In gmx.lists.linux.dvb you write: > > >>So VP-1020 is fine.. if other card owners also get back, i could get on >>with the next one.. > > > the card here (Twinhan VIsion ... ????) with CI slot (no CI inserted) > works fine. Loading the modules is much faster now. > I have not yet put the CI code into experimental yet, since i wanted to identify and filter out some bugs.. > Kernel is 2.6.11-rc2, because later kernels crash the system when > the bttv module is loaded. > > bttv: Bt8xx card found (1). > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:0a.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > bttv1: Bt878 (rev 17) at 0000:01:0a.0, irq: 19, latency: 64, mmio: 0xf8001000 > bttv1: subsystem: 00a0:bcf8 (UNKNOWN) > please mail id, board name and the correct card= insmod option to kraxel@bytesex > .org I think that one has a new PCI ID, It has a silicon tuner.. ? can you do an lspci -vv and post the PCI ID ? Some blown EEPROM's also give wrong PCI ID though.. > bttv1: using: Twinhan DST + clones [card=113,insmod option] > bttv1: gpio: en=00000000, out=00000000 in=00fb34fd [init] > bttv1: using tuner=4 > bttv1: add subdevice "dvb1" > bt878: AUDIO driver version 0.0.0 loaded > bt878: Bt878 AUDIO function found (0). > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:09.1[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 > bt878(0): Bt878 (rev 17) at 01:09.1, irq: 18, latency: 64, memory: 0xf8002000 > bt878: Bt878 AUDIO function found (1). > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:0a.1[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > bt878(1): Bt878 (rev 17) at 01:0a.1, irq: 19, latency: 64, memory: 0xf8000000 > DVB: registering new adapter (bttv1). > dst_check_ci: Recognise [DSTMCI] This looks like a new version of the VP-1030A.. The 1032A is not out in the market though.. ? Can you verify what VP-10XXX it is , such that it can be confirmed ? Manu
