On Friday 11 March 2005 15:16, Manu Abraham wrote: > > Exactly. > > One would need another layer with a "Twinhan command protocol" and the card > > driver only supplies the I2C, USB, etc. interface. This is kind of > > overkill right now when all cards on the market with this protocol are > > Bt878 based (or is the DVB-S USB adapter available?). > > I had thought about a different layer (but did not consider the USB > devices), considering the new PCI devices having multiple sessions.. > > I was wondering how exactly to tackle that one.. since all the devices > were common in one aspect. > > But at this point do we really need an additional layer ? As you said > wouldn't it be an overkill ? > > I think the devices are outgrowing the API too fast than expected.. I belive you should make the dst a new driver like the dvb-bt8xx one, and move the twinhan stuff out of dvb-bt8xx into dst. As far as I can see, they will then both depend on bt878. Make sense? Kenneth
