Kenneth Aafl?y wrote: > On Friday 11 March 2005 00:10, sean wrote: > > > >>cvs itself needs to be updated. or51211 has been replaced >>or51132. See http://dl.bytesex.org/patches/2.6.11-2/ >> >>or51132 does not spend upon bt878. >> >>Is there a reason cvs is not updated? Are there two seperate >>development paths? > > > or51211 is for pchdtv hd-2000 > or51132 is for pchdtv hd-3000 > Aha. That makes sense. Still, is there a reason it's not in dvb cvs? This probably reflects my confusion between v4l ( analogue?) and dvb ( digital?). sean
