Roberto Sebastiano wrote:
> + { 0x00011822, BTTV_TWINHAN_DST, "Twinhan VisionPlus DVB" },
>
> I suggest to change it just to "Twinhan DVB", because the Twinhan DTV
> Sat Express is also detected as BTTV_TWINHAN_DST
That's since the card is a bttv based card from Twinhan, the original
card (DVB-S) featuring a tuner from LG, and the tuner was called LG DST
Tuner, and hence Twinhan people referred the "card", not the MCU or the
tuner, internally in their driver as DST, standing for (D)igital
(S)atellite (T)uner.
The Twinhan company was originally, VVMER, then they changed there
company name to Twinhan, and their DVB PCI product range to Visionplus.
But, i would say the Visionplus would be more meaningful, as earlier
they did not have any EEPROMS having PCIID's. Now all the older cards
without EEPROM's are considered obsolete, and all new cards would
feature an EEPROM, and the Visionplus product range has a PCIID 1822.
And in this case, when they change a product range, it would be easier
identifying the product range.
So when Jamie was reverse engineering the driver, he gave the originally
referred name.
It does not make a difference what it is called, The point was to remove
the "-T" which was a bit misleading. It can be changed to anything that
looks better. Well, i conveyed the point accross.
Manu
