Nyk Tarr wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 11:59:18AM +0100, Peter Daum wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>after a long break (for previous experiences see the discussions following >>http://www.linuxtv.org/mailinglists/linux-dvb/2004/06-2004/msg00379.html), >>I just tried, whether there has been any progress with the DEC 2000-t >>usb box. The result was pretty much the same as with earlier attempts. >> >>What is new, is that Kernel 2.6.10 floods the syslog with stack traces >>complaining about a "Badness in usb_unlink_urb". Attached below are >>the messages right after connecting the box. Pretty much any action >>regarding the device will yield some more of these messages. Maybe the >>stack trace can bring enlightenment ... >> >>Note, that these kernel messages do not seem to reflect any new >>problem - everything still works as good or bad as described before >>(except reading from /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0 usually works). For most >>practical purposes it's still almost useless, because after some >>channel changes the box inevitably will die :-( > > > > I don't have the problem (cvs+2.6.10-ac7), but this patch shut up the > BUG() (or whatever it is). > > Use at your own risk - I'm ot a programmer ^_^ In the same spirit I attach a patch for ttusb-budget.c that works for me Colin -------------- next part -------------- --- ./media/dvb/ttusb-budget/dvb-ttusb-budget.c.orig 2005-01-21 14:45:06.000000000 +0000 +++ ./media/dvb/ttusb-budget/dvb-ttusb-budget.c 2005-02-12 23:03:29.000000000 +0000 @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ int i; for (i = 0; i < ISO_BUF_COUNT; i++) - usb_unlink_urb(ttusb->iso_urb[i]); + usb_kill_urb(ttusb->iso_urb[i]); ttusb->iso_streaming = 0; }
