Hi! > >>>+ /* Auto/manual exposure */ > >>>+ ctrls->auto_exp = v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu(hdl, ops, > >>>+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO, > >>>+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_MANUAL, 0, > >>>+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_AUTO); > >>>+ ctrls->exposure = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops, > >>>+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, > >>>+ 0, 65535, 1, 0); > >> > >>Is exposure_absolute supposed to be in microseconds...? > > > >Yes. > > According to the docs V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE is in 100 usec units. > > OTOH V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE has no defined unit, so it's a better fit IMO. > >Way more drivers appear to be using EXPOSURE than EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, too. > > Done, switched to V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE. It's true, this control is not > taking 100 usec units, so unit-less is better. Thanks. If you know the units, it would be of course better to use right units... Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
