On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + u32 max_vp_index;
> + u32 max_lp_index;
> + pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n",
> + ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index);
And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?!
%u, please.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
