Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] x86/hyper-v: fast hypercall implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/19/2017 07:09 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Hyper-V supports 'fast' hypercalls when all parameters are passed through
registers. Implement an inline version of a simpliest of these calls:
hypercall with one 8-byte input and no output.

Proper hypercall input interface (struct hv_hypercall_input) definition is
added as well.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h    | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
index e293937..028e29b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
@@ -216,6 +216,45 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output)
  #endif /* !x86_64 */
  }
+/* Fast hypercall with 8 bytes of input and no output */
+static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u16 code, u64 input1)
+{
+	union hv_hypercall_input control = {0};
+
+	control.code = code;
+	control.fast = 1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	{
+		u64 hv_status;
+
+		__asm__ __volatile__("call *%3"
+				     : "=a" (hv_status),
+				       "+c" (control.as_uint64), "+d" (input1)
+				     : "m" (hv_hypercall_pg)
+				     : "cc", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+		return hv_status;
+	}
+#else
+	{
+		u32 hv_status_hi, hv_status_lo;
+		u32 input1_hi = (u32)(input1 >> 32);
+		u32 input1_lo = (u32)input1;
+
+		__asm__ __volatile__ ("call *%6"
+				      : "=d"(hv_status_hi),
+					"=a"(hv_status_lo),
+					"+c"(input1_lo)
+				      :	"d" (control.as_uint32_hi),
+					"a" (control.as_uint32_lo),
+					"b" (input1_hi),
+					"m" (hv_hypercall_pg)
+				      : "cc", "edi", "esi");
+
+		return hv_status_lo | ((u64)hv_status_hi << 32);
+	}
+#endif

This is going to need an explicit "sp" annotation to force a stack frame, I think. Otherwise objtool is likely to get mad in a frame-pointer-omitted build.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux