Hi, [ Re sending with all recipients this time ... ] On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Oh, I have to ask, do you really mean "any later version" here and >> > elsewhere? >> > >> > If so, then your MODULE_LICENSE() marking is wrong, please fix that up, >> > or fix up the license text, I can't take incompatible ones without >> > getting angry emails from legal people sent to me... >> > >> >> Thanks for noticing this. >> >> The copyright + license notice is a boilerplate I got from the powers >> that be here. >> >> I'll consult internally what is the proper action. I don't want to >> make legal mad either... :-) > > Ok, I'll drop this patch series then, and wait for an updated one with > this fixed up. This issue, along with some others pointed by reviewers, are fixed in v3 of the patch set. I will be happy if you choose to take it into the staging tree and will continue to work to cut down the TODO list. Thanks, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker "If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
