On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:25:37PM -0700, skanda.kashyap@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Skanda Guruanand <skanda.kashyap@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Skanda Guruanand <skanda.kashyap@xxxxxxxxx> Changelog text goes between those two lines, right? > > I have modified struct lu_dirpage as suggested in lustre_idl.h file Why the extra ' '? > > CHECK drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:958:42: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 Why is this all wrapped? > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:959:42: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:962:42: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:963:42: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:985:50: warning: cast > to restricted __le32 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:1193:24: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:1328:25: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:1329:23: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:1332:25: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_request.c:1333:23: warning: cast > to restricted __le64 > > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h > index 60b827e..df48b8d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h > @@ -846,10 +846,10 @@ struct luda_type { > #endif > > struct lu_dirpage { > - __u64 ldp_hash_start; > - __u64 ldp_hash_end; > - __u32 ldp_flags; > - __u32 ldp_pad0; > + __le64 ldp_hash_start; > + __le64 ldp_hash_end; > + __le32 ldp_flags; > + __le32 ldp_pad0; Are you sure this is correct? How was it tested? Also, please fix your subject to properly match those already made for this driver... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel