On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:24:14AM +0100, Guillaume Brogi wrote: > > This patch fixes the following sparse warnings: > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c:2307:49: warning: cast from restricted __le16 > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c:2308:44: warning: cast from restricted __le16 > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c:2309:44: warning: cast from restricted __le16 > > Those three members of qos_parameters are indeed __le16 so they should > be converted to the cpu's endianness before being cast to u32. > > The lines are over the 80 character limit. They already were, and, for > the sake of readability, I don't think they should be split. Please fix up your subject: line to match other patches for this driver, I almost missed it :( > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Brogi <gui-gui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c > index 9209aad0515e..5946c1f8d37d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c > @@ -2304,9 +2304,9 @@ static void dm_check_edca_turbo( > /* For Each time updating EDCA parameter, reset EDCA turbo mode status. */ > dm_init_edca_turbo(dev); > u1bAIFS = qos_parameters->aifs[0] * ((mode&(IEEE_G|IEEE_N_24G)) ? 9 : 20) + aSifsTime; > - u4bAcParam = (((u32)(qos_parameters->tx_op_limit[0])) << AC_PARAM_TXOP_LIMIT_OFFSET)| > - (((u32)(qos_parameters->cw_max[0])) << AC_PARAM_ECW_MAX_OFFSET)| > - (((u32)(qos_parameters->cw_min[0])) << AC_PARAM_ECW_MIN_OFFSET)| > + u4bAcParam = (((u32)le16_to_cpu(qos_parameters->tx_op_limit[0])) << AC_PARAM_TXOP_LIMIT_OFFSET) | > + (((u32)le16_to_cpu(qos_parameters->cw_max[0])) << AC_PARAM_ECW_MAX_OFFSET) | > + (((u32)le16_to_cpu(qos_parameters->cw_min[0])) << AC_PARAM_ECW_MIN_OFFSET) | > ((u32)u1bAIFS << AC_PARAM_AIFS_OFFSET); > /*write_nic_dword(dev, WDCAPARA_ADD[i], u4bAcParam);*/ > write_nic_dword(dev, EDCAPARA_BE, u4bAcParam); How are you sure that this change is correct? How did you verify it? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
