On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:22:24AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:49:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:37:11PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > > Comparison, equal to zero, is redundant > > > > > > 'if (foo == 0)' is equal to 'if (!foo)' > > > > > > Typical kernel coding style is to use the shorter form. > > > > > > Remove unnecessary zero comparison. > > > > Not exactly. If you're talking about the number zero then == 0 and != 0 > > are good style. "if (size == 0) ". Other times we're talking about > > error codes or whatever and not the number zero so it should be > > "if (ret) ". Also for strcmp() functions, please use != 0 and == 0. > > > > if (strcmp(foo, bar) != 0) <-- read this as "foo != bar" > > if (strcmp(foo, bar) == 0) <-- read this as "foo == bar" > > if (strcmp(foo, bar) < 0) <-- read this as "foo < bar" > > > > regards, > > dan carpenter > > > > > > What is best for flags please? > > - if (dwrq->flags == 0) { > + if (!dwrq->flags) { The second one. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel