On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:32:43PM +0000, Dave Stevenson wrote: > NACK. > Phil asked for a couple of changes, although functionally identical. > I'll send a patch when I get a chance. What do you mean, "when I get a chance"? What's wrong with this one? > Your existing workaround has removed the immediate issue of the > overflow, this was only cleaning things up to actually match the > original API. Ok, so this patch is correct? I don't see why I shouldn't take it as it fixes the issue. What am I missing here, why exactly are you NACKing this? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
