On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 07:31:18PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > > > On 03/11/2017 10:59 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:54:55AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 03/11/2017 10:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>>I really don't think expecting the user to understand and configure > >>>the pipeline is a sane way forward. Think about it - should the > >>>user need to know that, because they have a bayer-only CSI data > >>>source, that there is only one path possible, and if they try to > >>>configure a different path, then things will just error out? > >>> > >>>For the case of imx219 connected to iMX6, it really is as simple as > >>>"there is only one possible path" and all the complexity of the media > >>>interfaces/subdevs is completely unnecessary. Every other block in > >>>the graph is just noise. > >>> > >>>The fact is that these dot graphs show a complex picture, but reality > >>>is somewhat different - there's only relatively few paths available > >>>depending on the connected source and the rest of the paths are > >>>completely useless. > >>> > >> > >>I totally disagree there. Raw bayer requires passthrough yes, but for > >>all other media bus formats on a mipi csi-2 bus, and all other media > >>bus formats on 8-bit parallel buses, the conersion pipelines can be > >>used for scaling, CSC, rotation, and motion-compensated de-interlacing. > > > >... which only makes sense _if_ your source can produce those formats. > >We don't actually disagree on that. > > ...and there are lots of those sources! You should try getting out of > your imx219 shell some time, and have a look around! :) If you think that, you are insulting me. I've been thinking about this from the "big picture" point of view. If you think I'm only thinking about this from only the bayer point of view, you're wrong. Given what Mauro has said, I'm convinced that the media controller stuff is a complete failure for usability, and adding further drivers using it is a mistake. I counter your accusation by saying that you are actually so focused on the media controller way of doing things that you can't see the bigger picture here. So, tell me how the user can possibly use iMX6 video capture without resorting to opening up a terminal and using media-ctl to manually configure the pipeline. How is the user going to control the source device without using media-ctl to find the subdev node, and then using v4l2-ctl on it. How is the user supposed to know which /dev/video* node they should be opening with their capture application? If you can actually respond to the points that I've been raising about end user usability, then we can have a discussion. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
