On 11/03/17 14:26, simran singhal wrote:
> Remove & from function pointers to conform to the style found elsewhere
> in the file. Done using the following semantic patch
>
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> identifier f;
> @@
>
> f(...) { ... }
> @@
> identifier r.f;
> @@
>
> - &f
> + f
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@xxxxxxxxx>
Given there aren't any other functional pointers in some the ad2s90
I have amended the patch title to reflect that we are changing
this to have consistency across drivers in the wider subsystem.
Far as I'm concerned, it's nice to tidy up. I'm not (currently)
advocating a tree wide sweep for these as the churn would be excessive
but it's not a bad thing to do in the staging drivers in my opinion!
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> index 82b2d88..a37e199 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec ad2s1200_channels[] = {
> };
>
> static const struct iio_info ad2s1200_info = {
> - .read_raw = &ad2s1200_read_raw,
> + .read_raw = ad2s1200_read_raw,
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> index 5b1c0db..b227090 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int ad2s90_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> }
>
> static const struct iio_info ad2s90_info = {
> - .read_raw = &ad2s90_read_raw,
> + .read_raw = ad2s90_read_raw,
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
