> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations. > > The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert > fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390. > > Other than that > Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@xxxxxxxxxx> Turns out that it is better that all these patches go through the respective maintainer trees, if present. If I send an updated patch (with subject fixed), could you merge it through your tree? Best Regards, Elena. > > -- > Johannes Thumshirn Storage > jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
