On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:44 +0530, simran singhal wrote: > This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally > useful after a break or return. [] > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c [] > @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data) > > if (i < 0xff) > return 0; > - else > - return -1; > + return -1; Assuming -1 is some sort of error, it'd be a more common style to use if (i >= 0xff) return -1; return 0; Looking at the code, it might make sense to use something like: /* SDA still != 0 */ if (i >= 0xff) return -1; return 0; } _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel