Thanks, Joe. Is this to say that scripts/checkpatch.pl should be updated to some higher column limit? I have made these cleanup changes before in a like manner. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:16 -0500, Nathan Howard wrote: >> Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "WARNING: line over 80 characters." > [] >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835.h b/drivers/staging/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835.h > [] >> @@ -163,8 +163,10 @@ int bcm2835_audio_write(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream, >> unsigned int count, >> void *src); >> void bcm2835_playback_fifo(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream); >> -unsigned int bcm2835_audio_retrieve_buffers(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream); >> +unsigned int bcm2835_audio_retrieve_buffers( >> + struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream); > > This is not a good change. > > This line exceeds 80 columns only because > it uses very long identifiers (30+ chars). > > Anything that uses these very long names > is going to be silly looking when forced > to use 80 column line length maximums. > > Basically, it's OK as it is and if you > really want to change it for any reason > the other style to use is to have the > return value on a separate line like: > > unsigned int > bcm2836_audio_retrieve_buffers(struct bcm2835_also_stream *alsa_stream); > > Even so, that's not a good change either. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel