On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "ret" isn't necessarily initialized on the success path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
The patch seems correct, but do you have any idea why gcc-7 didn't
warn about this?
I assume that you found it with smatch, and nobody else did.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
