Re: [PATCH 10/60] staging: lustre: obdclass: add more info to sysfs version string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:38PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Update the sysfs "version" file to print "lustre: " with
> the version number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5969
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/16721
> Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> index 9f5e829..22e6d1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ struct miscdevice obd_psdev = {
>  static ssize_t version_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>  			    char *buf)
>  {
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "lustre: %s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
>  }

Why?  You "know" this is lustre, why say it again?  Doesn't this affect
userspace tools?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux