Re: [PATCH 21/60] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: correct use of list_add_tail()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:49PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> From: "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In sptlrpc_gc_add_sec() swap the arguments to list_add_tail() so that
> it does what we meant it to do.
> 

Huh...  This is from before lustre was merged into staging.  What are
the user visible effects of this bug?  I would have expected it to get
caught earlier.


> Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8270

I bet the answer to my question is on this link but I'm reviewing
offline right now.  Plus that's not where the bug description belongs.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux