On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:28:30PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable > > > for the upstream client. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_fid.h | 353 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_ostid.h | 233 ++++++++++++++ > > > > Can you make a lustre "uapi" directory so we can see which files you > > really want to be UAPI and which you don't as time goes on? > > Where do you want them placed? In uapi/linux/lustre or uapi/lustre. Does > it matter to you? The below was to forth coming UAPI headers which from > your response you seem okay with in general. How many .h files are there going to be? It's just a single filesystem, shouldn't you just need a single file? If so, how about drivers/staging/lustre/include/uapi/lustre.h ? If you really need multiple .h files, put them all in the same uapi/ directory with a lustre_ prefix, you don't need a whole subdir just for yourself, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
