On 01/10/2017 06:57 PM, Kershner, David A wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Abdul Rauf Mujahid [mailto:abdulraufmujahid@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:51 PM >> To: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@xxxxxxxxxx>; >> gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jkc@xxxxxxxxxx; *S-Par-Maintainer >> <SParMaintainer@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning >> >> >> >> On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Kershner, David A wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Abdul Rauf [mailto:abdulraufmujahid@xxxxxxxxx] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:24 PM >>>> To: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jkc@xxxxxxxxxx; *S-Par-Maintainer >>>> <SParMaintainer@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning >>> This patch has the same subject line as the previous patch? Which one >>> should we use? Or can you make the names unique? >>> >>> David Kershner >>> >>>> Fix the following warnings: >>>> Block comments should align the * on each line >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rauf <abdulraufmujahid@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c >>>> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c >>>> index 336af52d43d7..4e630ea527e8 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c >>>> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct >>>> controlvm_message *inmsg) >>>> * >>>> * devices are automatically enabled at >>>> * initialization. >>>> - */ >>>> + */ >>>> parahotplug_request_kickoff(req); >>>> controlvm_respond_physdev_changestate >>>> (&inmsg->hdr, >>>> -- >>>> 2.11.0 >> you should use both of them. I am sending both again by changing their >> names. > Thanks! > > David Kershner Please ignore these two patches. I sent another patch yesterday after merging these two patches in one with subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: fix checkpatch block comments warning. Thanks. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
