On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 06:26:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > > That's fine by me. > > > > I guess the series should then start with a complete move > > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h -> > > arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv_proto.h, and the remaining patches have to > > change the latter instead of the former? > > That would be my preference, but we'll need to figure out why > hyperv has ever been a UABI header, and if anyone is using it. It was initially done by my former teammate, and I guess only QEMU (outside kernel) is using some of it. Roman. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
