Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by obdo move

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 17:34 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> 
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> 
> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:42:29PM +0000, Ben Evans wrote:
> > This was done to conform to the Lustre Coding Guidelines.
> 
> What is this mythical guidelines, and why does it differ from the kernel
> source ones?

It's not like it's hard to find
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Coding_Style_Guidelines

And in specific:
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Style_Guide_Includes

There is no single mandated code style for this.
Some people like reverse christmas tree.

Whatever...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux