On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:48:32PM -0700, Jason Litzinger wrote: > > This is fine, but the fact that the most subsystem feels like it has to > > have its own attribute type is the big problem with this file, that > > should not be needed at all, and hopefully will be fixed up someday soon > > (i.e. it's a requirement before it can get out of staging...) > Ok, couple follow up questions. > > Something like struct device/DEVICE_ATTR_* (or something that exists > already) to expose the same functionality? Yes, that is correct. > I'm happy to iterate patches to address this, but, Christian, do you already > have a plan/patchset in the works? I haven't come across a prior > discussion of this in the mailing list, but I may have missed it in my > search. It's a non-trivial change, and it requires you to understand the driver model code a bunch to make a new bus type and register devices to it. If you have questions about it, let me know. good luck! greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
