On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:07:37AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>> This patch fix the following sparse warnings in slicoss driver:
>> warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Remove IOMEM_GET_FIELDADDR macro
>> * Add ioread64 and iowrite64 defines
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
>> index d2929b9..d68a463 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c
>> @@ -128,6 +128,35 @@
>>
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, slic_pci_tbl);
>>
>> +#ifndef ioread64
>> +#ifdef readq
>> +#define ioread64 readq
>> +#else
>> +#define ioread64 _ioread64
>> +static inline u64 _ioread64(void __iomem *mmio)
>> +{
>> + u64 low, high;
>> +
>> + low = ioread32(mmio);
>> + high = ioread32(mmio + sizeof(u32));
>> + return low | (high << 32);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>
> eek, no! Don't write common kernel functions in a driver just because
> some configuration option was incorrect. That implies that you really
> can't do that type of read/write for that platform, so maybe you
> shouldn't be doing it!
>
> Split this up into one patch that does the 32bit stuff, then worry
> about the 64bit stuff in a separate patch please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
thank you for your clarification, Greg.
I'll send a v3 patchset with the two patches.
Cheers,
Sergio Paracuellos
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
