Sorry for this misunderstanding,
Since received a response from Stuart on my previous patch telling me I
was probably working on a out-of-date codebase,
I started to look where I did go wrong.
After some research I found out that I was always one step behind
because I was developing on the actual Linux kernel branch instead
of using the Staging-next as my codebase.
He wrote me to sent the patches that still apply over again with a new
version tag so that's why this patch only contains 2 of them.
I am still new at contributing to the Linux kernel and some things were
not really clear to me at the beginning.
I hope that you could still use these patches and I am trying to avoid
misunderstandings like these.
Do I still need to resend them and is there anything left for me to do
with these?
Best regards,
Shiva Kerdel
On 11/10/16 13:24, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Shiva Kerdel wrote:
Follow the kernel type preferrences of using 's16' over 'int16_t'.
Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc-bus.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What is different from your v1 patch?
I'm confused now, I have two different series from you, one 6 patches
long, and one 2 patches long, claiming to do the same thing.
I've dropped them both from my patch review queue and please, resend
what you really want me to apply :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
