On 11/01/2016 05:03 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The name passed to devm_regulator_get() should match the name of the >> supply as specified in the device datasheet. This makes it clear what >> power supply is being referred to in case of presence of other >> regulators. >> >> Currently, the supply name specified on the affected devices is 'vcc'. >> Use lowercase version of the datasheet name to specify the supply >> voltage. >> > > Aren't we possibly breaking current device tree definitions that > people may have? We should still check the old name after the new > datasheet name in my opinion. None of those drivers have DT bindings, so I think we are OK. And they are in staging anyway. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
