Re: [PATCH] staging :rtl8712: Free memory when kmalloc fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:00:01PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:10:09AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> >> There are few functions where we need to free previously allocated memory
> >> when kmalloc fails. Else it may lead to memory leakage.
> >> In  _init_cmd_priv() and _r8712_init_xmit_priv(),in few places we are not
> >> freeing previously allocated memory  when kmalloc fails.
> >
> > Odd use of spaces, can you fix that up?
> >
> >> This patch will address it.
> >
> > That last sentance is not needed.
> 
> Ok, I will do those changes.
> >
> > And isn't this a new version of a patch, or am I mistaken?  If so,
> > please properly version it as SubmittingPatches describes to do.
> 
> This is the new version of previous patch.
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Souptick joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c  | 5 ++++-
> >>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c | 5 ++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> >> index b7ee5e6..04638f1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c
> >> @@ -72,8 +72,11 @@ static sint _init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
> >>                           ((addr_t)(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) &
> >>                           (CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - 1));
> >>       pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf = kmalloc(MAX_RSPSZ + 4, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >> -     if (!pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf)
> >> +     if (!pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf) {
> >> +             kfree(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf);
> >>               return _FAIL;
> >> +     }
> >
> > If you need to set the buffer to NULL, please do so, last time I thought
> > you said it was required, is it really not?
> 
> This NULL is required. But I assume, last time you are not agree with it :)
> So I remove it in new version.

I did not say I disagreed, you just had to prove why you were doing
this...

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux