On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:43:56PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:50 AM > > To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: German Rivera <german.rivera@xxxxxxx>; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > agraf@xxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] staging: fsl-mc: cleanup and uprev to MC v10.x > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:42:09PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > This patch does miscellaneous minor cleanup and uprevs the supported > > > MC firmware version to 10.x. > > > > > > I believe with this series the TODO items on our list are complete, > > > with the exception of "Add at least one device driver for a DPAA2 > > > object", which I expect to send a patch for very soon. I plan to > > > do that in conjunction with a request to move the fsl-mc bus > > > driver out of staging. > > > > I applied some of these patches, can you rebase and fix up and resend > > the remaining ones? > > Yes, will resend. > > Regarding the patch: > [PATCH 14/14] staging: fsl-mc: uprev binary interface to match MC v10.x > > ...your comment was that it did a lot of different things at once. In > this case, there is no way for me to break that up. The things listed > in that patch were the changes to the binary interface of the hardware, > and to match it we have to change everything at once. Ah, ok, make that a bit more specific in the patch changelog text so I don't ask the same thing when you resend it and I re-review it :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
