On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:09:37AM -0700, Michael Zoran wrote: > I didn't think it looked totally correct, but I'm not sure it's any > more broken then what is already in the tree. It's not more broken. But better to leave the compile warning there to mark that it is an obvious security problem. > > If you can kindly point me to some other source code or documentation > to look at that is correct, I'm more then willing to fix the patch. > I was hoping the maintainers could chip in, because I didn't want to look at the code. We really need to track which are use pointers and which are kernel pointers. We can't mix them like this. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
