Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In commit d86e64768859 ("rtlwifi: rtl818x: constify local structures"),
> the configuration struct for most of the drivers was changed to be
> constant. The problem is that five of the modified drivers need to be
> able to update the firmware name based on the exact model of the card.
> As the file names were stored in one of the members of that struct,
> these drivers would fail with a kernel BUG splat when they tried to
> update the firmware name.
>
> Rather than reverting the previous commit, I used a suggestion by
> Johannes Berg and made the firmware file name pointers be local to
> the routines that update the software variables.
>
> The configuration struct of rtl8192cu, which was not touched in the
> previous patch, is now constantfied.
>
> Fixes: d86e64768859 ("rtlwifi: rtl818x: constify local structures")
> Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.8
> Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I got warnings and after a quick look they look valid but not sure:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/sw.c: In function ‘rtl92c_init_sw_vars’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/sw.c:179:6: warning: ‘fw_name’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/sw.c: In function ‘rtl8723e_init_sw_vars’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/sw.c:187:6: warning: ‘fw_name’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9370013/
Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status
from patchwork:
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
