On Tue, Sep 13, Alex Ng (LIS) wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Perhaps a better approach would be to list the known existing hosts and use
> > the new protocol for upcoming, unknown hosts via 'default:'.
> This is a good idea. I will create another patch that addresses this.
I think this variant would cover upcoming hosts for an old kernel:
switch (vmbus_proto_version) {
case VERSION_WS2008:
util_fw_version = UTIL_WS2K8_FW_VERSION;
sd_srv_version = SD_VERSION_1;
ts_srv_version = TS_VERSION_1;
hb_srv_version = HB_VERSION_1;
break;
case VERSION_WIN7:
case VERSION_WIN8:
case VERSION_WIN8_1:
util_fw_version = UTIL_FW_VERSION;
sd_srv_version = SD_VERSION;
ts_srv_version = TS_VERSION_3;
hb_srv_version = HB_VERSION;
break;
case VERSION_WIN10:
default:
util_fw_version = UTIL_FW_VERSION;
sd_srv_version = SD_VERSION;
ts_srv_version = TS_VERSION;
hb_srv_version = HB_VERSION;
break;
}
Olaf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
