Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] staging: android: ion: Add an ioctl for ABI checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:40:43PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> 
> The current Ion ioctls lack a good way to tell what ioctls are
> available. Introduce an ioctl to give an ABI version. This way when the
> ABI inevitably gets screwed up userspace will have a way to tell what
> version of the screw up is available.

This worries me.  Why do we need this?  Shouldn't any "new" abi changes
just add on, and not change existing ioctl structure calls?  Or worst
case, you remove an ioctl and then userspace "knows" that when the call
fails.

And who is the major userspace user of this interface?  Who controls it?
How are we keeping things in sync here?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux