On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:18:56 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:10:26PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote: > > This patch set is needed to fix issues of the hdm-usb module. > > You sent me 2 patch series for this same driver right now. One 9 > patches and one 8 patches. > > Which go first? Why 2 different sets? What am I supposed to do, guess? > I thouhgt the different patch series are going to be applied in the chronological order like they hit your inbox. Doesn't the date *when* a certain patch set s'been received mean anything? The two sets result from our internal development progress. Not every update on the driver gets immediately pushed upstream. That's why I ended up with two sets for a single module. > I'm dropping both of them, please resend _one_ set of patches, numbered, > so I know what to do. Please make it very obvious, otherwise I will get > it wrong... I'll go wrap them up again in one set. thanks, Chris > > Think about what you would want if someone were sending you patches... > > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
