2016-08-17 15:25 GMT+09:00 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:03AM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote: >> 2016-08-16 2:05 GMT+09:00 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:11:13PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote: >> >> The dgnc_block_til_ready() is only used in dgnc_tty_open(). >> >> The unit data(struct un_t) was stored into tty->driver_data in dgnc_tty_open(). >> >> And also tty and un were tested about NULL so these variables doesn't >> >> need to check for NULL in dgnc_block_til_ready(). >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> RESEND: This patch was not merged for a long time, if there is any reason >> >> why this patch could NOT be merged into staging tree, let me know. >> >> There were no comment for this patch. >> >> I cannot understand why this patch have to wait long time to merge. >> >> And I also sent emails to mailing-lists for reminding this patch... >> >> please let me know, what is the problem to merge this patch into staging tree. >> > >> > Please note, staging patches are at the bottom of my priority queue. >> > Combined with a vacation, conferences, and a merge window and there are >> > a lot of pending staging patches in my to-review queue. >> >> That's Ok. but I took a long time to wait for merging my patches in >> this case. :-( > > You are not alone. And what's the rush? These are just trivial staging > driver patches, it's not like you have the hardware for this device and > are needing these patches to get it to work, right? yes, you're right. Thanks. Regards, Daeseok Youn. > > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
