Re: [PATCH 19/58] staging: lustre: llite: add md_op_data parameter to ll_get_dir_page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:40:29PM +0100, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> > > From: wang di <di.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Pass in struct md_op_data for ll_get_dir_page function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: wang di <di.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7043
> > > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3531
> > > Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c          |    8 ++++----
> > >  .../staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h   |    4 ++--
> > >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c    |   15 +++++++++++----
> > >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This patch fails to apply, so I have to stop here in the patch series.
> > 
> > So I'm guesing your second patch series also will fail to apply, so can
> > you resend all of the outstanding patches you have sent me after
> > rebasing on my staging-testing branch?
> 
> Do you mind if I combine them into one series? Also I have a few more 
> patches I like to include. Is it okay to add those as well?

That's fine with me, send away!

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux