Op 08-08-16 om 21:59 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > 2016-08-08 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Op 20-06-16 om 17:53 schreef Gustavo Padovan: >>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> When creating a sync_pt the name received wasn't used anywhere. >>> Now we add it to the sync info debug output to make it easier to indetify >>> the userspace name of that sync pt. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c | 16 ++++------------ >>> drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c | 5 +++-- >>> drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.h | 9 +++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c b/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c >>> index b4ae092..ea27512 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/sw_sync.c >>> @@ -37,15 +37,6 @@ struct sw_sync_create_fence_data { >>> struct sw_sync_create_fence_data) >>> #define SW_SYNC_IOC_INC _IOW(SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC, 1, __u32) >>> >>> -static const struct fence_ops timeline_fence_ops; >>> - >>> -static inline struct sync_pt *fence_to_sync_pt(struct fence *fence) >>> -{ >>> - if (fence->ops != &timeline_fence_ops) >>> - return NULL; >>> - return container_of(fence, struct sync_pt, base); >>> -} >>> - >>> struct sync_timeline *sync_timeline_create(const char *name) >>> { >>> struct sync_timeline *obj; >>> @@ -108,7 +99,7 @@ static void sync_timeline_signal(struct sync_timeline *obj, unsigned int inc) >>> } >>> >>> static struct sync_pt *sync_pt_create(struct sync_timeline *obj, int size, >>> - unsigned int value) >>> + unsigned int value, char *name) >>> { >>> unsigned long flags; >>> struct sync_pt *pt; >>> @@ -120,6 +111,7 @@ static struct sync_pt *sync_pt_create(struct sync_timeline *obj, int size, >>> if (!pt) >>> return NULL; >>> >>> + strlcpy(pt->name, name, sizeof(pt->name)); >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&obj->child_list_lock, flags); >>> sync_timeline_get(obj); >>> fence_init(&pt->base, &timeline_fence_ops, &obj->child_list_lock, >>> @@ -191,7 +183,7 @@ static void timeline_fence_timeline_value_str(struct fence *fence, >>> snprintf(str, size, "%d", parent->value); >>> } >>> >>> -static const struct fence_ops timeline_fence_ops = { >>> +const struct fence_ops timeline_fence_ops = { >>> .get_driver_name = timeline_fence_get_driver_name, >>> .get_timeline_name = timeline_fence_get_timeline_name, >>> .enable_signaling = timeline_fence_enable_signaling, >>> @@ -252,7 +244,7 @@ static long sw_sync_ioctl_create_fence(struct sync_timeline *obj, >>> goto err; >>> } >>> >>> - pt = sync_pt_create(obj, sizeof(*pt), data.value); >>> + pt = sync_pt_create(obj, sizeof(*pt), data.value, data.name); >>> if (!pt) { >>> err = -ENOMEM; >>> goto err; >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c b/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c >>> index 4c5a855..b732ea3 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c >>> @@ -75,13 +75,14 @@ static void sync_print_fence(struct seq_file *s, struct fence *fence, bool show) >>> { >>> int status = 1; >>> struct sync_timeline *parent = fence_parent(fence); >>> + struct sync_pt *pt = fence_to_sync_pt(fence); >>> >>> if (fence_is_signaled_locked(fence)) >>> status = fence->status; >>> >>> - seq_printf(s, " %s%sfence %s", >>> + seq_printf(s, " %s%sfence %s %s", >>> show ? parent->name : "", >>> - show ? "_" : "", >>> + show ? "_" : "", pt->name, >>> sync_status_str(status)); >>> >> NAK, >> A fence in sync_print_fence can be of any type. If you want to print the name, use the fence_value_str callback. > Indeed. But fence_value_str doesn't return the sync_pt name, but the > seqno of that fence. I'll keep this change out for the de-staging and > then try to come with something that works better. > > Gustavo This will probably cause a kernel panic if you keep it like it is and you look at debugfs for non sync_pt fences, it should definitely be fixed before destaging. Ignoring sync_pt name would be better than crashing. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel