I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/most/hdm-i2c/hdm_i2c.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/hdm-i2c/hdm_i2c.c b/drivers/staging/most/hdm-i2c/hdm_i2c.c
index ba0263b..ed28058 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/hdm-i2c/hdm_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/hdm-i2c/hdm_i2c.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(polling_req, "Request Polling. Default = 0 (use irq)");
/* Polling Rate */
static int scan_rate = 100;
-module_param(scan_rate, int, 0644);
+module_param(scan_rate, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(scan_rate, "Polling rate in times/sec. Default = 100");
struct hdm_i2c {
--
2.9.2
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
