I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c index bf077f8..a952fd6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_mc_capture.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static bool debug; static bool interface; module_param(interface, bool, S_IRUGO); -module_param(debug, bool, 0644); +module_param(debug, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); /** * VPFE capture can be used for capturing video such as from TVP5146 or TVP7002 -- 2.9.2 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
