Re: staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary uses of the variable "retval"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Can you follow expectations around the proposed refactoring of any
>> function implementations?
> 
> I don't understand both questions. Maybe you need to give examples?

I suggest to try the following script (semantic patch for working with
the Coccinelle software) out on the discussed source files.


@checking_function_calls_directly@
identifier checker, retval, work;
expression list el;
statement is, es;
type rt;
@@
 rt checker(...)
 {
  <+...
-retval = work(el);
 if (
-    retval
+    work(el)
    )
    is
 else
    es
  ...+>
 }


Do you find such a source code transformation useful?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux