Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:53:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:17:57PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> > kmemleak helped me to identify a memory leak in hv_pci_onchannelcallback() >> > and while fixing it I stumbled upon an unrelated issue(s) there. >> > >> > Vitaly Kuznetsov (2): >> > PCI: hv: don't leak buffer in hv_pci_onchannelcallback() >> > PCI: hv: handle all pending messages in hv_pci_onchannelcallback() >> >> I applied both to for-linus for v4.7 with Jake's acks, thanks, Vitaly. > > Somehow I must have been thinking these were fixes for things we > merged or broke during the v4.7 merge window, but that doesn't look > like the case. So I'm going to merge these for v4.8 instead, on the > theory that the v4.7-rc cycles are primarily for stabilization. Right, this is not a 4.7 regression. Thanks! -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
