On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Oleg Drokin wrote: > >> http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/docs/GPLv2.pdf is no >> longer around, so replace it with (hopefully more permanent) >> http://http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html > ^^^^^^ > >> [...] >> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/service.c | 2 +- >> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c | 2 +- >> 240 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/curproc.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/curproc.h >> index c673dfc..2ab5002 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/curproc.h >> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/curproc.h >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ >> * >> * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> * version 2 along with this program; If not, see >> - * http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/docs/GPLv2.pdf >> + * http://http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html > ^^^^^^^ > > "http://"; was repeated. duh, oh well. Resend time. > And "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/"; is preferred Is it? I don't mind it either way, but since we do "GPLv2 only", seemed to make sense to only link to that? Also: [green@intelbox2 linux]$ git grep gpl-2.0.html | grep -v staging/lustre | wc -l 62 [green@intelbox2 linux]$ git grep www.gnu.org/licenses'$' | grep -v staging/lustre | wc -l 3 So the gpl-2.0.html is used in a lot more places in the kernel code. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
