On Monday, June 13, 2016 4:07:34 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote: > The semaphore 'txq_add_to_head_cs' is a simple mutex, so it should be > written as one. Semaphores are going away in the future. Looks good to me. > Also, removing > the timeout scenario as the error handling code does not propagate the > timeout properly. Good catch! I guess wilc_wlan_handle_txq() running into a timeout would end putting the semaphore in a state in which we never again block on it because the count is now one higher than it should be. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
