Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:06:27AM -0500, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> It would be helpful and instructive for anyone involved in this debate
> to review the following URL which details Intel's SGX licening
> program:
> 
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-sgx-product-licensing

I think it would be good  to note that the licensing process is available
only for Windows. For Linux you can only use debug enclaves at the
moment. The default LE has "allow-all" policy for debug enclaves.

> I think the only way forward to make all of this palatable is to
> embrace something similar to what has been done with Secure Boot.  The
> Root Enclave Key will need to be something which can be reconfigured
> by the Platform Owner through BIOS/EFI.  That model would take Intel
> off the hook from a security perspective and establish the notion of
> platform trust to be a bilateral relationship between a service
> provider and client.

This concern has been raised many times now. Sadly this did not make
into Skyle but in future we will have one shot MSRs (can be set only
once per boot cycle) for defining your own root of trust.

/Jarkko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux